Maxwell's Displacement Current The term DISPLACEMENT CURRENT is absolutely different in its meaning when applied in thermodynamics and radio electronics. The notion was introduced by Maxwell, when he worked on developing an electromagnetic field theory to describe low currents generated, when charged particles are displaced in dielectrics.

The first working prototype was developed long before the technical analysis was attempted. Plasma research is a fairly new field of acceptable science. At this time most printed text is from foreign Countries, and a majority from Russia.

Preliminary version for evaluation 15.04.2001 by Mr. Juha Hartikka, MScTech, Finland.  Update 17.04.2001.

Interdimensional Force Concept

An experimental theory about forces as tensions between different sets of dimensions.

It was a startling idea—that magnetism, like electricity, flows in currents and can decompose water (TIME, Jan. 24). U.S. physicists kept politely mum. Their skeptical silence annoyed Dr. Felix Ehrenhaft of Manhattan. Recently, before the American Physical Society at Pittsburgh, he enunciated his theory again.

The Healing Water Institute is an international education and research group with charitable trusts in New Zealand, the United Kingdom and currently being formed in the United States.

Our whole aim is to help water support life better. Water is under great attack from agricultural and industrial pollution and urban mis-use , greatly reducing its ability to support life.

To achieve this we provide education events, we research water and also design technology that helps improve water's condition.

mirrored from http://web.archive.org/web/19981202195740/http://www.riess.org/sriess.html
Stephan Riess (1898-1985) was a Bavarian-born mining engineer and geologist who emigrated to the United States in 1923. While working in a deep mine in the 1930's, Riess was amazed, after a load of dynamite was set off, to see water gushing out of nowhere in such quantities that pumps installed to remove it at the rate of 25,000 gallons per minute could not make a dent in it.

Nuclear engineer and scalar energy theorist discusses Tesla, Maxwell, regauging, Poynting flow, back EMF, virtual particle flux of the vacuum, general relativity and other exotic topics in electrodynamics.

Fluid Flow and Temperature Gradients IWONE 2007 Sweden mp4 http://nav.tii.se/~david/dj_iwone07_03082007198.mp4 690Mb IWONE 2007 International Workshop on Natural Energies 2007 Sweden Institute of Ecological Technology Alternative Water Flow The relation between fluid flow and temperature gradients David Jonsson, Sweden VS spoken word: I had to, step by step, through countless observations and countless phenomena - i had to come to a picture. It is the way i always say, The one who lives a hundred years ahead, cannot understand the present.

RUSGRAV.ASC Contributed by Joel McClain - 05/22/94

In studying the work of Walter Russell, it becomes apparent that the
classic distinctions between energy and matter are in perception, as
opposed to construction. In his experiments at Westinghouse, Russell was
able to change the atomic content of matter through the application of
magnetic energy at the angle which was complementary to his chart of the
elements.

In other words, distilled water could become predominately hydrogen or

Master’s Thesis 2006, Institute for Ecopreneurship IEC, FHNW, Switzerland
HANDLING WATER an approach to holistic river rehabilitation design
Niels Werdenberg
Conservation biologist, environmental engineer

“…A wholly excellent work and highly recommended reading for any serious student of river engineering and water resources management generally.”
Callum Coats, Ecotechnology expert

Abstract

TERRA video of a presentation by Jay Harman with visuals by Michael Green on biomimicry at Bioneers 2007. more info on bioneers from http://www.bioneers.org/
WWND = What Would Nature Do?

Designing the Next Golden Age

By Jay Harman

The following text is from a speech given at Bioneers 2004.

Welcome to the new Golden Age! Yes, here, today, right now, in what may feel for some of us like the darkest of times, we are creating a new Golden Age. I think we’re ready for this. We know, deep inside, that a better age for our world is absolutely crucial, and we know it’s possible. That’s why we continue to get up in the morning—to strive for a better world. For me, I know this new Golden Age is possible because of what I’ve learned from nature.

Nature.

Learning from Nature How to Create Flow Without Friction

Timothy Thrapp/WITTS have started gathering quite an enormous amount of interest over the alt.energy scene, after posting three videos on YouTube in 2007+2008. Something has rung true through their way of communicating and the people they mention. Even a few skeptics have done a bit deeper digging into the history of WITS/WITTS/Thrapp, and have emerged convinced that they definitely have spent decades in researching devices and are actual R&D engineers with an aim to improve the world.

LISTEN TO THE DRUMBEAT

 

http://home.earthlink.net/~rivedu/14tesla.html

INTERNATIONAL TESLA SOCIETY IN REVIEW:

People, Politics, and Technology

(c)2002 by Michael Riversong

TOP 10 IMPOSSIBLE INVENTIONS THAT WORK

 

this is a mashup of articles that detail PaxScientific, and its CEO, Harman's quotes. obviously i started doing this because it has deep connections to what Viktor Schauberger was saying all along. seems there is a huge movement of Biomimicry, that is blissfully unaware of one of its predecessors, Schauberger - with his Comprehend&Copy method. at least back in 2005, PAX Scientific had nothing to say when asked about Viktor Schauberger.

enjoy! if you can.

By Leslie R. Pastor

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Congress:Member:Leslie_R._Pastor

The crux of Tom Bearden's published work, ultimately, is to reveal that the current 'energy' system is and has been deliberately flawed and curtailed preventing the acquisition of using 'free and abundant' sources of energy freely from the 'vacuum of space-time.'  Most people presume that 'energy' is 'created' by the power companies and then transferred along a grid line directly into your homes and places of business.  Nothing could be further from the truth, and, because it is true, has been deliberately hidden from the general public, academia, and our current electrical engineering schools.

rexresearch.com
Home

---

Viktor SCHAUBERGER

Austrian Patents
(Water Control by Vortex Action)

 

by Paul E Potter

Very briefly, Schauberger engineered several types of machines that would create an up-current of axially-spinning air so powerful that the up-current's drag force would speed the whole machine higher and higher into the air. Of the many different types of air turbines he made several of them boasted a thrust force of nearly 10,000 bhp - simply by moving air. Some designers have utilised Schauberger's special turbines for flight and new research suggests that there indeed is a strong case for the continuation and re-establishment of Schauberger's research into these hugely beneficial technologies.

Central to any understanding of Schauberger's levitating force is his use of the cycloid-space-curve, which initially he used to generate a dual flow of fluid through a pipe (see note 1) - of an inner axial flow which moved faster through the pipe than did its peripheral flow which was especially directed into a cycloid path next to the pipe wall (see Schauberger's patent 134543).

http://www.ultralightamerica.com/edavlll.htm 

EDAV PROJECT PART lll

Electro Dynamic Air Vehicle
January, 2005

click here for EDAV Project Part l

click here for EDAV Project Part ll

>>  click here for EDAV Project Part lll  <<

click here for Waveplate Mechanics

  http://www.nuenergy.org/iw/2005/zorzi2005.htm         Kim Zorzi
          e-mail: [email protected]
          website: http://www.ultralightamerica.com/edav.htm

"So our goal here is to design a new aircraft that does not run on the usual combustion technology. But on the energy of the wind, by producing stable vortices that can produce lift from the centrifugal acceleration of air."

by IET http://www.iet-community.org/research/flowtechnique.html

Introduction
This report is an attempt to understand and learn from the ideas and inventions of the Austrian forester Viktor Schauberger. Viktor Schauberger already in the 1920s warned about environmental crisis, at a time at which it was not, as today, something recognized. During his lifetime, he encountered resistance and ridicule, and his perspective may still today be labelled as unconventional and unorthodox, although much of what he wrote about our handling of waters and forests today is more relevant than ever. As he wasn't an academic, but was more of a natural philosopher, he had trouble to communicate his ideas with contemporary scientists. In this report, we'll try to show how modern research in chaos and self-organizing systems give us a possibility to shed some new light on Vikor Schauberger, and perhaps establish a deeper understanding of the phenomena he described.

http://www.hasslberger.com/tecno/tecno_2.htm

Hydropower engineering, up to this day, is almost esclusively concerned with two variables, one being the altitude differential between head water and turbine and the other the quantity of water that can be brought to flow through the turbines.

A third important variable, the velocity of flow of water, is generally not thought to be important. It is taken into consideration only as the velocity resulting from the release of water pressure connected to and dependent on altitude differential but not as an important factor in its own right. In fact, current design of hydropower facilities normally excludes utilization of the dynamic energy potential inherent in the free flow of water. A dam destroys this natural energy potential by bringing the water from its dynamic state of flow to a static state, a complete absence of motion.

If we study the writings of Viktor Schauberger and Ludwig Herbrand, we find that the energy inherent in the free and unhindered flow of water may be potentially much greater than that obtainable from the exclusive use of pressure resulting from altitude differential.

A normal flow of water rather than an altitude-induced pressure, has been used in mills and old blacksmith hammerworks of the pre-industrial era.

Schauberger

In recent times, it was Viktor Schauberger, the Austrian inventor and genial observer of nature's ways who first advocated the use of increased water velocity rather than water pressure for the production of hydroelectric power. He obtained a patent for what he termed a jet turbine (Strahlturbine) as early as the year 1930. (1)

The principles used by Schauberger in order to increase water velocity were the jet configuration of the water inlet pipe and the promotion, by spiral ribbings on the inside of the jet, of a vortex motion of the water.

Schauberger's patent actually gives us two very important clues to innovative changes in hydropower technology.

The first one is, that a pipe configured as a funnel or jet will increase the velocity of the water's flow by restricting the space available in which the water may flow. This increase in velocity is especially great if the funnel or jet allows or even encourages the water to form a characteristic flow pattern known as a vortex. This vortex pattern itself has a tendency, quite separate from the jet-effect, to increase the velocity of the water, to decrease its temperature and to augment the water's density.

The second innovation proposed by Schauberger is a revolutionary design of the turbine, obtaining rotation at very high speeds and at the same time avoiding the usual difficulties of cavitation found in normal high speed turbine designs. In fact Schauberger's turbine wheel is of conical shape, with 'ribs' spiralling down the surface of the cone in a corkscrew pattern, and it is located in the center of the jet of water. The corkscrew turbine wheel parts the flow of water, takes up the water's dynamic energy and lets the flow continue without major disruption. Turbines of current design "hack" the water into thousands of destructive counter flows and cross vortices, thus wasting much of the available energy and causing the common problem of cavitation, a super fast corrosion and destruction of turbine blade material.

Here is the description of this new type of turbine as given in Schauberger's patent number 117 749:

"The subject of the invention is a hydropower machine, which utilizes the living energy of a jet of water for the purpose of power generation.

According to the invention, the turbine wheel is a cone with corkscrew-like blades. The cone is aligned with its axis in the direction of the axis of the jet. In this way the jet of water is split and diverted out of its course and thus gives its whole living energy to the spinning cone in a way that, providing the lenght of the cone and the width of its base are in a correct relation to each other and provided the blades are set at the correct angle, these parameters depending on the speed of the water jet, the water will flow out of the machine without agitation.

The illustration is an approximate schematic representation of the invention.

The spinning cone, which is aligned with its axis (1) in the direction of the water jet leaving the jet pipe (2), is made up of blades (3) in the form of a corkscrew.

The ends (4) of these blades (3) are bent somewhat upwards against the direction of the arriving water jet in order to cause a diversion of the jet and to transfer as much as possible of the living energy of the jet to the spinning cone.

On the inside of the jet pipe (2) there are screw-like ribs (5) promoting a spin, which according to actual observations increase the speed of the water jet and the efficiency of the machine.

PATENT CLAIMS:

• A jet turbine, distinguished by the fact that in the path of the water jet and aligned with its axis so as to split the jet, there is a turbine wheel in the form of a cone, the surface of which is formed of corkscrew-like blades.

• A jet turbine according to claim 1, distinguished by a jet pipe (2) with ribs (5) slanted in the direction of spin of the turbine wheel."

This patent was applied for in 1926 and granted in 1930. It seems that Schauberger actually used a small turbine of this design in a stream of water near the forest wardens' building during those years, to generate electricity, but no reliable records are available. (2)

Herbrand

Another instance of the use of the dynamic powers of flowing water has been documented by Ludwig Herbrand, a German engineer who as a student in the mid 1930's was called to evaluate and calculate the parameters of some generators and exciter units that had recently been installed in the Rheinfelden power station, as well as to design electrical overload protection and relevant switching mechanisms for these generators. He was also required to compare the generators with those of another power station that had been described in an article of a specialized magazine.

Much to the dismay of the then young and inquisitive engineering student, it seemed that the generators under examination were supplying more electrical energy than they should have, according to accepted theory. One of the generators of the Rheinfelden power plant, with 50 cubic meters of water per second and an altitude differential of only one meter supplied just as much power as a generator in near Ryburg-Schwörstadt, which had a capacity of 250 cubic meters of water per second and an altitude differential from head waters to turbine of 12 meters! (3)

That fact was confirmed by prof. Finzi, the designer of the turbines and generators, saying to young Herbrand:

"Do not worry about this. It is correct. The generator has been working without problems for some time now. Make the calculations backwards and you will see for yourself. We are electrical engineers. Why, those other problems are not ours to solve, we leave them to the water people. We have repeated our measurements and the generator's yield of power is exactly as specified. The only thing is - no one knows about this." (4)

Herbrand was soon drafted into the army and World War II did not allow him to pursue the matter further. Only much later, in the 1970s and 1980s, Herbrand came back to the calculations made for his engineering exams and tried - so far without success - to interest industry and government in this different and more efficient use of hydropower.

Technical facts

I shall attempt to delineate here the technical facts, using calculations that are based on accepted formulas and physical considerations confirmed by actual experiment, to show that with a different approach to hydropower engineering, we could obtain significantly more electrical power than is being extracted from hydro resources today, with simpler machinery and less expenditure, as well as less disturbance to the environment.

As mentioned above, current hydropower engineering works with water pressure, obtained as a result of the altitude differential between head waters and location of the turbine. This pressure, when released through the turbine, results in a momentary acceleration of the water and thus in a certain velocity of the water jet. This velocity is calculated with the formula

v = Sqrt 2 ^. g ^. h v being the velocity, g the gravitational acceleration of the earth (9.81 m/sec²) and h the altitude differential measured in meters.

Example: An altitude of 12 m results in a velocity of Sqrt 2 ^. 9.81 ^. 12 = 15.3 m/sec.

The progression of velocity in relation to altitude differential is shown in the following table.

head in meters	12	24	36	48	60	72	84	96	108	120
velocity in m/sec	15.3	21.7	26.6	30.7	34.3	37.6	40.6	43.4	46	48.5
head in meters	132	144	156	168	180	192	204	216	228	240
velocity in m/sec	50.9	53.1	55.3	57.4	59.4	61.4	63.3	65.1	66.9	68.6

These values are rendered graphically below.


We see that the curve of velocity at first increases more steeply and then tends to flatten with higher altitude differentials.

Let us now examine the energy output in kilowatt with increasing altitude differential.


The increase of energy output is linear, as shown in the graphic above.

Calculation

The electrical energy that can be obtained from water is calculated on the basis of the velocity of flow and the mass of the water, i.e. magnitude of flow measured in cubic meters per second, according to the formula

E kin = m/2 ^. v ² (kw)

An example, assuming a velocity of 25 m/sec and a mass of 5 cubic meters per second: