Home

compression

Excerpts from an article written by Brian Desborough entitled "Why I Wrote "They Cast No Shadows""

Submitted by esaruoho on February 15, 2009 - 00:09
"Authors of non-fiction books often experience difficulty in acquiring sufficient data to fill a book of normal length. In contrast, the research material acquired by myself over the past three decades has resulted in an overabundance of riches. Consequently, I’ve had to omit much important research material in my book and also shorten some passages."
»

November 09, 1930: Mr. Russell May Be Right

Submitted by esaruoho on July 30, 2008 - 14:12

New York Times, November 9, 1930, Sunday
Section: Editorial, Page E2, 5899 words

MR. RUSSELL MAY BE RIGHT
Dr. Jackson Withdraws Criticism of "Two-Way" Universe and Seeks Proof

To the Editor of The New York Times:

»

November 02, 1930: Mr. Russell Upholds Theory of a "Two-Way" Universe - Proton Is Not A "Hole," He Declares

Submitted by esaruoho on July 30, 2008 - 13:59

New York Times, November 2, 1930, Sunday
Section: Editorial, Page E2, 5965 words
Letters From Times Readers On Topics in the News;
MR. RUSSELL UPHOLDS THEORY OF A "TWO-WAY" UNIVERSE
Proton Is Not a "Hole," He Declares, Merely Because It Acts Like One

To the Editor of The New York Times:

»

John Bedini: Reactive Power is the clue to Monopole, Hendershot, Moray..

Submitted by esaruoho on February 7, 2008 - 21:24
Bob,
The Tesla patent had to do with, how Tesla wound his coils and the special method used. As I was saying, the power termed as"free energy" is radiant in nature, and reactive when in use by us. The inter circles have put all these "skeptics" to work in all the chat groups and before that they were "disrupters". These people have nothing good to say about anything. After my 35 years of experiments with the term "free energy" and "over unity machines". This is what it turns out to be "Reactive power" and that's it.
»

Sonofusion according to wikipedia (jumble of pages slapped together)

Submitted by cybe on March 29, 2007 - 09:07

--------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Esa Ruoho <esaruoho @ g m a i l .com>
Date: 22-Mar-2007 14:14
Subject: sonofusion according to wikipedia (jumble of pages slapped together)
To: [email protected]

ok
wikipedia likes to call sonofusion "bubble fusion" too (see end of message)
acoustic cavitation they want to call sonic cavitation.

so according to this Sonofusion is a common name for nuclear fusion, occurring during sonoluminescence, which is an extreme form of acoustic cavitation. acoustic cavitation occurs when ultrasound-waves are passed through a liquid, which causes the formation of bubbles, which is known as cavitation.
because a sound-wave periodically compresses/decompresses (NOTE! inhale-exhale) a liquid, cavitation can be produced in the low-pressure part of the cycle, when the sound intensity is enough.

WikiPedia when talking about cavitation, mentions impellers, but does in no way explain whether there is a connection between the rotational frequency of the impeller, the shape of it, and cavitation occurring. however, it has been suggested in books by Callum Coats, that cavitation is a intense reaction caused in pressure-based propellers or impellers, and this is because of the poor movement of this shape. that this causes the impellers+propellers damage!

wikipedia also speaks of non-inertial cavitation, where a bubble in a fluid is forced to _oscillate_ in size/shape due to an acoustic field. this is used in ultrasonic cleaning of baths.

Sonoluminescence: "the emission of short bursts of light from imploding bubbles in a liquid when excited by sound."

Dale Pond equates "Implosion" "Water-hammer effect" and "Cavitation" as being the same thing, which keely and schauberger and were working towards.


He speaks of it in these two videos:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9125003792513982191


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5430570751600484561

 

»
Syndicate content