(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2) Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501 Sponsored by Vangard Sciences PO BOX 1031 Mesquite, TX 75150 April 21, 1991 GRAVITY7.ASC -------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a letter to the Editor of the now defunct Flying Saucer magazine of January 1963. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Dear Ray (Palmer - Editor); I postulate, here, an hypothesis, or possible explanation for the numerous plane (particularly jet) crashes. By correlating several theories I come to this general hypothesis. The first theory is that there exists, in certain areas, NEGATIVE ENERGY or, perhaps better stated, REVERSE GRAVITY "fields". By this I mean that within the perimeter, extending upward, gravity operates IN REVERSE. I refrain from further explanation, by quoting examples and such, for fear of "contradicting" statements to follow, thus ridding this discussion of needless confusion. This second theory is basically that of Shaver with regard to gravity. First, says Shaver's theory, gravity is NOT A PULL FROM WITHIN, but A PUSH FROM WITHOUT. This push is accomplished by the planetward flow of "exd". This "exd", for those unfamiliar with Shaver's theories, is the intermediate stage in the TRANSFORMATION OF MATTER INTO ENERGY (called integrance). EXD, by the way, is ex-disintegrance. (Which came first, the proverbial chicken or the egg - disintegrance or integrance?) The exd particle is the ash of transformation. The fall or condensation of exd into matter, CAUSING FRICTION, PRODUCES the force we call gravity. Now, I postulate, by correlating these two theories, that there is some electro-magnetic force set up (responsible for the reverse gravity) that COUNTERACTS THE INFLUX OF EXD (responsible for gravity), thus producing a ZONE OF ZERO GRAVITY. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Vangard note.. We must bring up two items of interest at this juncture, 1) EXD can be thought of as TACHYON energy, AETHER or ZPE, 2) Friction as used here can be translated into modern terms as interference since this energy moves in waves and can be "collided" against itself to generate resistance and therefore matter. Page 1 We suggest you download NEUTRAL1 to get an idea of the Vangard approach to trying to understand the Universe. -------------------------------------------------------------------- This zone of zero gravity extends, probably, to the extremity of the electro-magnetic force's influence, more than likely DECREASING as the distance from the Earth INCREASES. Further, the negative area's effect IS VARIABLE, that is, it is regular or irregular. (Let me clarify the last statement in paragraph three. If, for example, I had said that when gravity works in reverse, objects WOULD NOT BE PULLED DOWN, but would BE PUSHED UP, this would contradict a statement, as an example, in the following paragraph. This statement would have been that objects are PUSHED DOWN TOWARD the planet, rather than BEING PULLED DOWN. You can see the confusion and contradiction set up.) We are to assume that the force of exd is INFINITELY LONG- LIVED, because of the CONTINUOUS TRANSFORMATION of energy/matter. Thus, if the negative energy "source" was cut (or turned?) off, the exd would AGAIN FLOW DOWNWARD. Thus, if any object happened into this area AS THE EXD WAS FLOWING BACK, it would be carried, or PUSHED, downward at once to be stopped by the earth, or any other planet, for that matter. This is the theory; that planes happen into these areas, resulting in this inevitable doom. A point to ponder would be the application of this effect in an artificial manner for propulsion of saucers. Of course, as was hinted in a previous paragraph, this coud be the work of the DERO of Shaver's caves. They could control the apparatus to counteract the INFLOW OF EXD. It is stated as fact, through fictional surroundings, in "I REMEMBER LEMURIA" that this was a form of transportation, that of counteracting the force of INFLOWING EXD and being PROPELLED UPWARD by some SECONDARY FORCE. (Let me comment on this theory and others in general. First, let me say that I am a major (in school) in Mathematics and Science (particularly Physics). Through studying Mathematics, I have learned a few facts other than those presented in the texts (if at all they ARE facts). Everyone knows, if they have studied Mathematics at all, that the whole scheme is based upon unknowns and assumptions. By using common sense, anyone should be able to see that the scheme itself is an assumption or unknown. Mathematicians say they can prove their statements. I say they CANNOT. There is a form of "proof" known as Mathematical INDUCTION that is used extensively to "prove" their statements. The Page 2 perplexing discovery here is that they CANNOT PROVE that Mathematical induction is foolproof, without, of course, using some other form of "proof" which cannot be proved without, of course, using some other form of "proof" which - ad infinitum! (This whole scheme called Mathematics is enigmatic and sometimes paradoxical. Of course, no one will doubt the handiness of this system. We would be, most assuredly, lost without it. This brings us to the question asked so many times, namely, "What, in this universe of ours, is PROVED?" I say, with grateful reassurance, that there are systems or schemes which ARE PROVED. Take, for example, Chemistry. It is possible to take two chemicals and combine them, by using some action, into a compound, COMPLETELY DIFFERENT from either of the two initial components. This compound is seen to be formed each time these two chemicals are combined in this manne. This is impossible with Mathematics. You can SAY two plus two is four you will be right. But wouldn't it be just as much possible to say two plus two is three or any other number? These mathematical quantities we call numbers are INTANGIBLE, thus, they CANNOT be explored and combined in a tangible way, as with chemicals. It is, however, possible to associate tangible quantities with the intangible numbers. Two, for example, could be associated with the quantity of wings a bird has. (What would happen with three wings, or eliminate the intangibility of this statement and say more wings than most birds? Think this isn't possible? Prove it!) As can be seen this possibility nullifies this system of "proof" and it becomes no more a system of proof.) Webster says a theory is an explanation based on certain available information, or something to that effect. What puzzles me is that he fails to say that a theory is unproven, which indeed it is. My theory is based on two other theories, EACH UNPROVEN, and is thusly, UNPROVEN. Joe Wright Route 1, Benton, Kentucky -------------------------------------------------------------------- Vangard note... We have had the distinct pleasure of meeting Mr. Walter Wright, THE modern proponent of the PUSH GRAVITY theory which will soon be listed on KeelyNet. Mr. Wright has many proofs and excellent models to verify his contentions. Videotapes of his models in operation are excellent and have served to convince many scientists and lay people of the validity of the PUSH GRAVITY model. We refer you also to the work of Dr. Hans Nieper, listed on KeelyNet as TACHYON1 and TACHYON2. Page 3 This article also touches on the many strange disappearances in the Bermuda Triangle, the Devils' Triangle, the Sargasso sea as well as the likes of Judge Crater. We can't forget about the mysterious teleportations where a person or object is lifted up and set back down hundreds of miles away from his original location. Many of these have been attributed to UFO's or paranormal causes. It is just as reasonable to include the possibility that a NEGATIVE GRAVITY ZONE suddenly appears in which the victim is accidentally caught. An unexpected uprising of air and other material in the path of the NEGATIVE GRAVITY FIELD could create a dazed or unconscious state, not to mention the possibility of low level magnetic stimulation to create hallucinatory experiences as researched by Persinger. For more on induction of such experiences, refer to the BIOLOGY section on KeelyNet and the files MIND5, MIND6, MIND7, MIND8. -------------------------------------------------------------------- If you have comments or other information relating to such topics as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page. Thank you for your consideration, interest and support. Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet -------------------------------------------------------------------- If we can be of service, you may contact Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 4