(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2) Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501 Sponsored by Vangard Sciences PO BOX 1031 Mesquite, TX 75150 There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS on duplicating, publishing or distributing the files on KeelyNet except where noted! January 16,1994 TESBUCK.ASC -------------------------------------------------------------------- This file shared with KeelyNet courtesy of Joel McClain. It is a combination of two uploads based on experiments carried out by Joel with bucking magnetic fields. -------------------------------------------------------------------- TESBUCK1.ASC Joel McClain January 10, 1994 Description: Tesla coil output connected to matched, coaxial bucking coils. Output measurements taken using an analog volt meter, with leads removed, and placed in the proximity of the coils. Additionally, a NE-2H lamp was used to determine the presence of radiated energy, and a standard AM radio was used to "listen" to output variations during testing. (see NEONDET.ZIP, or NEONDET.ASC & NEONDET.GIF) Two matching coils were wound, each coil consisting of 3.5 meters of 75 Ohm coaxial cable. The core diameter of the coils is the same as the diameter of the Tesla coil secondary windings. The coils were wound in opposite direction relative to each other, with one wound CW and the other wound CCW. Approximately one inch of insulation and shield was removed from the cut ends of each coil, and the connector ends were left intact. The coils were placed next to each other, and the output from the Tesla secondary was connected to each of the coils at the center conductors, and jumpered to the shields to eliminate stray capacitance. When two matching coils of this type are placed along side of each other and energized with alternating current, their fields will "buck" each other, effectively cancelling the EM fields of both coils. As such, the "cancelled" energy is combined to form a scalar wave of twice the input frequency. Additionally, it was found that: 1. An energy "well" was formed in the inside diameter of the coils, as detected by testing with a NE-2H plasma lamp, connected on one lead to a 24" jumper cable. The "well" appears to be in the shape of an hourglass, with energy concentrated at the juncture between the coils. When the NE- Page 1 2H was lowered into the "well", it would illuminate. However, if the NE-2H was connected to the Tesla output and then lowered into the well, it would extinguish. The "well" appears to be a vortex of energy which extinguished the lamp by depleting the charge. As the lamp exited the "well" at the lower end, the lamp once again illuminated. 2. The Tesla coil output is effectively doubled in terms of radiated energy, as measured from the open ends of the bucking coils. 3. The Tesla coil appears to operate more stably at its resonant frequency with the matched coils connected to its output. 4. Radiated energy from the bucking coils increases considerably with distance from the Tesla secondary. Observations: Applying a matched impedance device to a Tesla coil output will improve the stability and output dynamics of the coil. The device must be able to withstand the level of output without dielectric breakdown. Using bucking coils is a method for creating scalar potential, thus there should exist a scalar potential in the gap between the coils, extending on a horizontal plane. Therefore, the bucking coils are a matched impedance scalar antenna/translator for the Tesla coil. The alternate phase inversions should cancel magnetic fields. The first set of bucking coils exhibited dual sets of polarized fields. After rewinding the coils more carefully, the stray fields were eliminated. An additional set of matching bucking coils should work in a complementary manner with the first set, permitting the scalar energy from each set to translate back into EM energy, forming a "Tesla Shield" in the gap between the coils. This will be attempted next. Having wound an additional set of matching coils for the above test, it was found that the "Tesla Shield" could not be created. The added load of an extra set of coils saturated the Tesla secondary, causing output to drop below measurable emission levels. This test will be repeated using another Tesla coil of similar constructionto power the extra set of coils. -------------------------------------------------------------------- TESBUCK2.ASC Joel McClain January 12, 1994 Additional test data concerning the Tesla coil output to bucking coils. Test Set-up: Tesla secondary connected to twin, stacked coaxial coils which are arranged in a bucking configuration, so that the windings rotate in opposing directions. At the center of the test stack, a scalar potential should exist which is equal to double the amplitude and frequency of the Tesla secondary output. Observations: It was observed that the coils form a "negative energy vortex", which depleted the electrons from energized circuits which are placed in the vortex field, causing those circuits to extinguish. It was also found that the radiated energy of the coils, relative to the Tesla coil, was much greater. To fully test the theory of the vortex, one additional test was required, that being a reversal of direction of the energized circuit into the vortex field. Result of Test: A NE-2H on a 24" jumper was lowered into the field. The jumper was connected to the Tesla secondary. Upon entering the vortex, the lamp extinguished. Continuing to lower the lamp until it was out of the vortex resulted in the lamp lighting. If a vortex exixts, it must be possible to enter the lamp from the bottom of the stack, and see it extinguish where it previously had lit, and upon exiting the top, it should light where it previously had extinguished. This test was performed successfully several times. It is my opinion that this is due to the direction of energies in the vortical flow. Energy is "pulled" from the lamp as it enters the vortex from either direction, and "pushed" into the lamp as it exits the vortex. This test was performed both before and after reversing the lamp connection between coils, to be certain that a phase inversion was not causing the lamp to light or extinguish. Results are identical regardless of which coil is connected to the lamp. I would also like to note that I have been experiencing fatigue since the beginning of this test, which may or may not be related to the energy absorption properties of the coils. I consider the tests to be complete at this time. -------------------------------------------------------------------- If you choose to experiment with this device, please note Joel's comment regarding a fatigue. This could be tested by plants, insects or animals to note reduced activity when in the presence of such a field. However, please take precautions when experimenting with these unknown qualities. -------------------------------------------------------------------- If you have comments or other information relating to such topics as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page. Thank you for your consideration, interest and support. Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet -------------------------------------------------------------------- If we can be of service, you may contact Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 3