(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2) Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501 Sponsored by Vangard Sciences PO BOX 1031 Mesquite, TX 75150 There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS on duplicating, publishing or distributing the files on KeelyNet except where noted! December 24, 1992 MAGALT.ASC -------------------------------------------------------------------- This file is based on personal information from Mr. Lee Jones. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Vangard Note I had a recent phone conversation with an interesting fellow in which he spoke of a "free energy" device that he had heard of. He heard it from a friend who had seen it while on a tour of duty during the Viet Nam War. This file is presented on KeelyNet in two forms : MAGALT.ASC - this ASCII text ONLY MAGALT1.ZIP - the ASCII text and the MAGALT1.GIF -------------------------------------------------------------------- In Lee's own words Here's the best I can remember of what I heard from a good friend. He was in Viet Nam during the time when "tourism" was at it's worst. There was a need for a quiet way to make electricity (in a jungle environment where noise would show the presence of enemies to the Viet Cong) Someone on a NAVY ship figured this design out during a long boring trip at sea. The discs (see MAGALT1.GIF) were from some kind of ship's motor or generator and when spun they continued to do so, causing the alternators attached to them to turn and make lots of AC current. His description as far as I can remember is presented in the .GIF file. Now, you must understand he is NOT an engineer and his description of what he saw may not be corect. For example..the "alternators" attached to the magnetic discs might not have been alternators but some kind of device that changed the energy that traveled down the shafts connecting them to the magnets. What I'm saying is that this is a VERY limited starting point from which to attempt to reverse engineer this device. I'm sorry but this is the best I can do. He said the Alternators were wired together and that the only time the machine stopped working was when the discs got out of sync and had to be restarted by aligning a mark on each disc and giving them both a spin toward each other from the top. I assume the discs were eccentrically mounted but this is not absolute nor is anything else...beg apology... I tried my best Page 1 to obtain more info about this design but was unsuccessful. As I said he wasn't an engineer and didn't understand what he was looking at, other than the obvious; that it was producing power without fuel!! He said that there was a fellow in Oregon someplace that had built one of these but didn't want anything to do with anyone about it. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Vangard note I might add some of what Lee told me on the phone that would further clarify the machine and its operation. The basic description of the machine was that it consisted of two identical units that were placed next to each other. Each had a magnetic disk that was about 3 feet in diameter and from 2 to 3 inches thick. Each magnetic disk was mounted on the shaft of the generator which when spun caused the generation of current. It would seem the weight of the disks caused them to function as flywheels with the magnetic field giving a push or pull at the right time. (I thought he said on the phone that the disks spun on a vertical axis but the drawing (MAGALT1.GIF) refutes that.) He said each of the generators provided EQUAL amounts of energy and that the energy that was drawn from each unit must be MIRRORED by the other. That is, when one generator was drawn on for more power than the other, the unequal loading would cause the spinning flywheel magnets to lose their sync and rotate to a halt. Each disk had a reference mark that would remain in sync as long as the disks spun. The means of starting the wheels to spinning was to grab both disks and pull at the same time. They would then begin to spin and eventually achieve a stable rotation. (Much like how the Testatika machine is started and achieves ITS OWN RESONANT velocity!) Lee also said that his source mentioned that the disks were slightly off-balance due to being mounted on an eccentric. As I understood it during the phone conversation (and now looking at the .GIF image) he indicated the disks got closest to each other WHEN THE SYNC MARK came around. If the polarization was on the north half of the disk (imagine a bar magnet in the center of the disk, and there could be more than one) with the south being on the opposite half, it would then provide the maximum polar repulsion as the disks came into contact at the closest eccentric proximity point. Since like poles REPEL, then one can see how the axis of the north OR south pole would have the greatest force while the equator would provide the least due to field cancellation. As it rotated around, the repulsion would gradually DECREASE as it approached the equator (90 degrees from the pole). On passing the equator, the velocity from the repulsion of the last orbit would continue to drive the disk through the INCREASING repulsion of the opposite south pole, though at a much LESSER INTENSITY because of the greater distance between the poles. (this is the trick, how to Page 2 overcome that increasing replusion to cause the disk to go over the "hump") This means that when the sync lines that were drawn on each disk were lined up, the disks would be CLOSEST to one another. 180 degrees from that point, the opposite sync lines would mean the disks would be at the GREATEST distance due to the eccentric. So, with the addition of the eccentric rotation (which Lee said was about 1/4" distance at the closest point of the disks, the closer the better) then the REPULSION WOULD BE GREATEST when the axis of each pole lined up. For those without graphics capabilities, I have included an ASCII equivalent drawing so you can get an idea of the machine. least repulsion at neutral magnetic equator 3 foot wide disk 3 foot wide disk 旼컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴� 旼컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴� 2-3" � magnetic disk 孤Sync팠 magnetic disk � thick 읕컴컴컴컴컫컴컫컴컴�mark읕컴컫컴컫컴컴컴컴컴� 旼좔컴좔� 旼좔컴좔� � � eccentric� � Generator � � mounted � � Generator One � � on shaft � � Two 읕컴컴컴� 읕컴컴컴� shown at farthest proximity ------------------------------------------------------------------- greatest repulsion at poles 旼컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴왯컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴컴커 sync mark팠 S N 납 N S 孤 sync mark 180 out 읕컴컴컴컫컴컫컴컴컴牡컴컴컴쩡컴쩡컴컴컴켸 180 out 旼좔컴좔� 旼좔컴좔� � � � � Generator � � � � Generator One � � � � Two 읕컴컴컴� 읕컴컴컴� shown at closest proximity ------------------------------------------------------------------- One more point that Lee said on the phone, though I might be mistaken. As I remember the conversation, he said he thought the disks might have been slightly tilted (on the horizontal axis). If there was a weight added to one side of the disk, probably at the sync mark, then that might give an additional impetus to accelerate the rotation to overcome the increasing repulsion on the "uptake". The machine would appear to operate on a very common principle associated with most perpetual motion devices. Most machines are lucky to achieve 60% efficiency. 100% would be unity and anything over that would be overunity. The idea with overunity is for the machine to be able to provide enough energy to sustain its operation in a closed system. Anything beyond what that takes would thus be "free energy." We would appreciate your comments on this matter. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet If we can be of service, you may contact Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 3