______________________________________________________________________________ | File Name : FLEXFLO.ASC | Online Date : 12/07/95 | | Contributed by : Anonymous F/E Guy| Dir Category : ENERGY | | From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 | | KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 | | A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences | | InterNet email keelynet@ix.netcom.com (Jerry Decker) | | Files also available at Bill Beaty's http://www.eskimo.com/~billb | |----------------------------------------------------------------------------| The following text files were sent to KeelyNet anonymously with the intent of stimulating experiments with this type of circuit. The information is being honestly presented and believed to be worthy of further investigation. These circuits have presented anomalies which need to be investigated by many people and are offered in the spirit of sharing information. They represent the 'state of the art' as per the contributor and are subject to revision based on future enhancements or refutations. Please be fair and constructive in your comments, preferably based on personal experiments. If you choose to experiment using this information, please share your observations or findings with KeelyNet and others. Thanks!......>>> Jerry The files are listed as : FLEXFLO.ASC - this text file PROOF1.GIF - proof of overunity circuit FLEXWAT1.GIF - water analog to how FlexFlo works FLEXFLO1.GIF - simplified conserver circuit FLEXFLO2.GIF - advanced conserver circuit FLEXFLO.ZIP - all the above files zipped into one ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Wiseman Theory of Energy Conservation by Anonymous F/E Guy (who takes no credit for this idea) Concept origin: George Wiseman H and A Industries Rt. 2 Box E-35 Bowling Green, MO 63334 If you are interested in true F/E principles, I recommend that you contact "H & A Industries" for a catalog of their products. Specifically, order the books entitled: "The Energy Conserver Method, Book 1" $15 "The Energy Conserver Method, Book 2" $15 handling $3 --------------------- Total $33 The book money goes into furthering Mr. Wiseman's research which will result in more info for US to use. Please purchase these books if you are interested in studying this device. There is much more information contained in the books that I don't plan to delve into in this extremely short text. Mr. Wiseman explains his process of experimentation fully and also notes the many strange effects of his devices. His ideas seem to FULLY explain the true nature of electricity. I am in no way affiliated with Mr. Wiseman or H & A Industries, but I do HIGHLY recommend these books for your personal library. The principle behind this circuit is simply this: This circuit takes an initial charge from a power supply or battery (12vdc for this circuit). That charge is recycled several times through a resistive load (a bulb, for this demonstration). The circuit produces the same mysterious "pulsating" lightbulb effect that the "Sweet Vacuum Triode" and the "Testatika" produce through the bulbs that they power in their respective videos. These circuits are ONLY TWO POSSIBLE FORMS for this power recycling. I would like to encourage anyone who would be kind enough to make this into a solid- state circuit that the capacitors could simply be "plugged into". A MOSFET switching device using digital timing for duty-cycles and pulse frequency would be a fantastic boon for further research using this little toy. This recycling can be accomplished at any voltage, as long as your components can handle it. High Voltage arc contacts might be used instead of solid state switches. Well, now the rest is up to YOU. Get the books. Study the books. Let's get this F/E boat rockin'! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Principles of FLEXFLO circuits Theories and original circuit concepts from " The Energy Conserver Method " by George Wiseman For Complete info, order a catalog from H & A Industries Rt. 2 Box e-35 Bowling Green, MO 63334 Mr. Wiseman's books contain much more information than I an provide in this short text. I highly recommend ordering and reading the "energy conserver" books. from the anonymous F/E guy see files: PROOF1.GIF FLEXFLO1.GIF FLEXFLO2.GIF FLEXWAT1.GIF The first and most important principle of these circuits is the understanding that a resistive 'Load' DOES NOT CONSUME electricity. This is easily illustrated by examining ANY school text on electrical theory. They always show several examples. I have emphasized a few points in these examples to demonstrate my point. 1. Electrons flow from a battery's negative pole, to a batteries positive pole. ALWAYS. Once the electrons (current) complete the circuit and enter the positive pole, some of the battery's potential is destroyed. The more current that flows, the faster the battery goes "dead". 2. Electron flow (current) THROUGH a wire "causes" a magnetic field around that wire. The field strength is in direct proportion to the amount of current. The electrons don't DISAPPEAR in the wire. They go IN one end AND OUT the other. 3. Electron flow THROUGH a bulb produces light and heat. The current does not DISAPPEAR inside the bulb. The same current flows on both sides of the filament. The current going into the bulb is the same as the current that leaves the other side of the bulb. Nobody ever seems to notice the obvious contradiction between electricity passing COMPLETELY THROUGH a load and electricity being CONSUMED WITHIN a load. It has to be one or the other, not both. Resistive loads only slow down the current, they don't consume it. If they did, your battery would last longer on devices that consumed more electricity because the electrons would vanish inside the load and never reach the positive pole of the battery. In the real world a circuit works like this, one electron goes in, one electron comes out. That's just the way it works. The FLEXFLO circuits are designed to hold a volume of electricity and "pour" it from one bank of capacitors to another bank through a load. If the circuit in FLEXFLO2.GIF is constructed using standard grade electrolytic capacitors, it should move approximately 3 to 4 times as much electricity through the load area than what is actually drawn from the battery. (based on actual circuit measurements and calculations.) The Charge of a Capacitor is figured in coulombs: Q=CE where: Q = electric charge (coulombs) C = capacitance (farads) E = voltage (V) A coulomb is a measure of electrical VOLUME contained in a capacitor. Using this formula with the capacitances and voltages in a circuit, we can calculate approximately how much energy will move through that circuit. See Flexflo2.gif in relation to the following example. Measurements taken from an actual prototype in operation. Energy used for switching was on a separate circuit and is not used in the calculations. My prototype used four 110,000uF @ 25v capacitors, Four DPDT relays, one microswitch to activate relays, one 13.6 volt car battery, and many bits of colored wire. C1 and C2 make Bank 1. C3 and C4 make Bank 2. Step one: Battery was connected to bring charge across C1 to 13.6 volts. At this point C1 and C2 are in parallel while C3 and C4 are in series. Battery was then disconnected. Total capacitance of Bank 1 is .22 farads @ 13.6 V = 2.992 coulombs Bank 2 is .055 farads @ 13.6V = .748 coulombs ------------------------------------------------- Total system charge = 3.740 coulombs Step two: C1,C2 placed in series. C3,C4 placed in parallel. This caused a VOLTAGE imbalance which caused 2.244 coulombs of charge to pass through the load point to equalize voltages of the two banks. ( 2.992 ) - ( .748 )= 2.244 coulombs moved through load point. Bank 1 is now .055 farads @ 11.15 volts = .613 coulombs Bank 2 is now .220 farads @ 11.15 volts = 2.453 coulombs ----------------------------------------------------------- Total system charge = 3.066 coulombs At this point the voltage across C3 was measured at 11.15 volts. Total system charge is now calculated to be 3.066 coulombs. System charge loss from step 1 to step 2 calculated to be .674 coulombs. Step three: C1,C2 placed in parallel. C3,C4 placed in series. This causes another VOLTAGE imbalance which causes 1.840 coulombs of charge to pass through the load point in order to equalize voltage potential between the two banks. ( 2.453 ) - ( .613) = 1.840 coulombs moved through load point. At this point the voltage across C1 was measured at 8.7 volts. Total system charge is now calculated to be 2.393 coulombs. System charge loss from step 2 to step 3 calculated to be .773 coulombs. Bank 1 is now .220 farad @ 8.7 volts = 1.914 coulombs Bank 2 is now .055 farad @ 8.7 volts = .479 coulombs ------------------------------------------------------- Total system charge = 2.393 coulombs The battery is now connected to recharge C1,C2 through the load, and C3,C4 directly. This moves another 1.078 coulombs through the load point while charging C1,C2. Total charge taken from battery to recharge whole system to 13.6 volts is 1.347 coulombs. ( 3.740 ) - ( 2.393 ) = 1.347 coulombs used from battery. Charge passed through load point: step 1 = 2.244 coulombs step 2 = 1.840 coulombs During Recharge = 1.078 coulombs ------------------------------------ total = 5.162 coulombs Charge taken from battery = 1.347 coulombs --------------------------------------------- Over-Unity output = 3.815 coulombs or 383% "efficiency" Several tests were conducted without any load resistance present in the circuit (dead short across load point), and several tests were performed with various types of resistive loads (electromagnet, bulbs, motor). In every case, the measured charge potentials of the capacitors remained virtually the same at every testing stage. The fact that purely resistive loads don't "consume" electricity is shown in the circuit PROOF1.GIF. Diodes do cause a voltage drop across the load and do lower the measured voltages by about 1 volt per diode in series with the load. I attribute the constant voltage drops to mechanical stress loss inside the capacitors. Many small capacitors in parallel, as opposed to a large single capacitor, might help offset the losses to a degree. Bearden spoke of "laboratory grade" capacitors that have almost no internal stress losses. These might provide a nearly lossless flex circuit. Since there is a fixed amount of potential loss per cycle, it would be best to design a load that makes the most use of each charge cycle. I suggest a self-variable resistor in series with the load to maintain a constant useable voltage/current through most of the transfer cycle. The output is a high voltage spike that drops to zero over time in accordance to load resistance. (20 volts down to 0 volts) Using V=IR we should be able to construct a solid-state resistor that can be set at any desired current level so that it will maintain a steady current through the load during most of the charge cycle. Bulbs, heater elements and magnets are directly useable without the use of this variable resistance device. IDEAS FOR DEVICES: Build a motor that "flex's" power via the commutator. Collect the C.E.M.F. from the stator magnets to feed charge back into the system. Use mechanical torque of motor to drive generator. This motor should only need 4 stator electromagnets and 2 permanent magnets on the rotor. Build a "Testatika" device. Wheel is driven by HV pulses through stator magnets. Leyden jars are arranged as in FLEXFLO2.gif and commutator directs charges approprietly. Commutator is NOT full contact device; NO CONTACT FRICTION LOSS! HV spark jumps small gap to transfer charge. Meanwhile, charge is collected from static generator portion of device. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tapping "Massless Displacement Current" using a capacitor as a "collector" by the anonymous F/E guy See PROOF1.GIF for circuit diagram This is a REAL EXPERIMENT that can be performed by anyone using only the following materials: - 3 electrolytic capacitors 2 are >50,000uF and one small one for the "collector", 10,000uF - 12 volt D.C. power source (for charging 1 capacitor) - A good V.O.M. (digital preferred, or an O-scope) Connect the two large capacitors as in the circuit in PROOF1.gif. Leave out the variable resistor. This is where you'll be using the small capacitor. Leave the "load" point open so that a load can be added in order to complete the circuit. Step 1: Make sure C1 and C2 are completely discharged. Charge C1 with the battery. Check the voltage across C1 and write it down. Step 2: Short the connection across the load point to allow the charge from C1 to equalize with C2. Now check the voltage across C1 and also across C2. They should be the same. Write down the voltage readings. Step 3: Repeat step 1. Now, make sure your small cap is discharged. Then, place it in series in the load point. Remove it from the load point and check the voltage on it. Now discharge it into a bulb or something. Step 4: Place the small cap into the load point a few more times, each time removing, checking voltage, and discharging it. When it no longer goes above 0volts you can stop. That means that the potential differences in C1 and C2 have equalized. Check the voltage across C1 and then C2. They should be approximately the same readings that you found in step 2. This circuit plainly shows that Bearden's "massless displacement current" is a REAL and TANGIBLE substance. It can be extracted by repeatedly halting a D.C. circuit with a small, or large, capacitor. Explanation: Current flows through a capacitor until it reaches a full charge. The same current flows on both sides of the capacitor. The charged capacitor can then be removed from the circuit, the massless displacement current is drawn off, and the capacitor is then placed back into the circuit where it fills up again. The same amount of current flows through the circuit each time. This is a passive "electrical milking" that can be performed on just about any D.C. circuit. If the "milking" was done in microsecond pulses, a normal electronic circuit would never realize it's happening. This could mean that many conventional power supplies, heaters, lamps, etc..., could be made to run with nothing but a single input pulse. With several stages of the same circuit stacked on top of each other, many everyday devices could be made self powering. Well, there you go. I'm no electronic designer. I leave it up to those of you who can make this into a solid state device of some sort. Enjoy! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------