______________________________________________________________________________ | File Name : DPALMA8.ASC | Online Date : 10/31/95 | | Contributed by : Andrew Mount | Dir Category : ENERGY | | From : KeelyNet BBS | DataLine : (214) 324-3501 | | KeelyNet * PO BOX 870716 * Mesquite, Texas * USA * 75187 | | A FREE Alternative Sciences BBS sponsored by Vanguard Sciences | | InterNet email keelynet@ix.netcom.com (Jerry Decker) | | Files also available at Bill Beaty's http://www.eskimo.com/~billb | |----------------------------------------------------------------------------| A very simple and cheap homopolar generator can be constructed using the details of the file CLARK11, available freely from KeelyNet. We have two KeelyNetters who report it works as described and we expect some data for speed vs. output in the near future as more people experiment with this small version. Bruce DePalma is currently living in Auckland, New Zealand as of 1995. Andrew Mount is DePalmas secretary and assistant. The homopolar generator would be an ideal high current, low voltage source for the production of Browns gas or hydrogen to run an engine or do welding in a hybrid arrangement. If you choose to experiment in these areas, please share your findings and observations with KeelyNet........thanks!.......................>>> Jerry ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Released January 6, 1988 DePalma Energy Corporation, 1060 Channel Drive, Santa Barbara, CA 93108 Two years ago the DePalma Energy Corporation initiated the construction of a large N machine which was scaled from smaller machines which were used to verify the validity of direct extraction of electrical energy from space or the vacuum. The N-1 machine was to produce a high enough output voltage so as to be efficiently convertible to high voltage alternating current. Target parameters for the machine were 12 v.d .c output at 10,000 amperes for a 6000 r.p.m. rotational speed. The rotor is a key component of the N-1 generator, and into it goes most of the time and effort in constructing the machine. Figure (1) shows the completed rotor suspended from a crane. Two N-machines are connected electrically in series on a common shaft. Magnetic polarity is NS-SN so that rotation of the unit causes the voltages to be additive. Electrical connections are made to the outer edges via liquid metal, metallic mercury wetted contacts as shown in figure (2). Some of the considerations incorporated into the design are: The idea of series, two machines on the same shaft, is a good one because with magnetic polarity indicated only two identical mercury contacts are needed. The drawback is the necessity of separating the two N machines far enough from each other so as to reduce the demagnetizing effect of one on the other. A further simplification is the use of only two support bearings for two machines, providing the center section can be made stiff enough to place vibrational problems above the planned operating speed of the machine. The 9-1/2 inch separation of the two magnet stacks resulted in a 20% reduction in the field strength of the combination. Initial computer simulations of the field strength inside 8-3/8 inch thick, 13 inch diameter magnet stacks of NdFeB magnet material indicated 9000 gauss. Actual measurements gave only 3/4 of the expected figure, 6750 gauss. Together with the 20% loss due to the proximity of the magnets the resultant field strength is 5400 gauss in the center of the stacks. We have found some relaxation in the strength of NdFeB magnets in open flux path operation even when the diameter to thickness ratio is what would normally considered to be a safe 2:1. The achievement of a field strength of 6750 gauss uniformly distributed over a diameter of a 13 inch circle with permanent magnets without a closed flux path is impressive considering the size of the water cooled electromagnet needed to produce the same result. Nevertheless it was felt that the flux inside the machine could be increased by making the machine partially self-exciting. This was accomplished by subdividing the 14 inch diameter by 3/8 inch thick copper disc in the center of each magnet stack into two parallel windings of two turns each. This is done in the manner of Tesla, (Reference 1). Since the machine is operating on the slope of the demagnetization curve of the magnets a small increment of magnetic induction will result in a disproportionate increase of the magnetic flux of the magnets. With sufficient current drawn from the machine the output impedance will decrease and may become negative. At present the measured internal resistance of the machine is 75 micro-ohms at 800 amperes and the voltage output is 1.216 volts per 1000 r.p.m. Mercury contacts must be amalgamated by hand before assembly and seem to improve with running time. Mercury builds a surface layer of oxide in contact with atmospheric oxygen. Oxide sludge can be eliminated by operating the machine in an inert helium atmosphere and hermetic sealing of the unit. The N-1 generator incorporates both of these features which also prevent any leakage of mercury or mercury vapor into the environment. The rotor is constructed on a BeCu shaft 2 inches in diameter and 49 inches long. BeCu is used for strength and good electrical conductivity. The center section between the magnet stacks is stiffened by a 6 inch diameter 1/2 inch wall aluminum cylinder which encloses the central axle of 2 inch diameter BeCu. The two central shafts are screwed together in a coupling which when the magnet stacks are rotated one relative to the other, tightens and places the aluminum cylinder in a state of compression. The stressed center section is stiffer than if the connection was a solid 6 inch diameter cylinder. All components are anodized and teflon coated so that electrical conduction takes place along the designed path. The magnet stacks themselves are constructed of 200 pieces each made from NdFeB hexagons of dimension 2 inches (across the flats) by 1 inch thick, pre- magnetized. Each magnet weighs about 1 pound. The magnets which repel each other intensely are assembled and glued together with proprietary adhesives. The assembled magnet stack is wound with 1/4 inch of graphite fiber roving followed by 1/4 inch of epoxy-fibreglass. As constructed the rotor should be capable of 10,000 r.p.m. without damage. Further development would result in a rotor capable of standing 20,000 r.p.m. without flying apart. The mercury contacts operate totally satisfactorily but are not entirely leakproof. A small amount of mercury is lost in the operation of the machine which amounts to about 1/2 c.c. per minute. A continuous flow system can be provided to recycle and clean the mercury. As can be seen from figure (2) the edge of the copper disc protrudes a distance slightly less than 1/2 inch into a slightly larger channel cut into a copper bussbar which encircles the magnet stack. The actual point of contact with the mercury is made at a radius determined by exploration with a Hall effect magnetometer. There is a point, somewhat above the surface of the magnet stack where the fringing field produced by the presence of the copper disc is exactly canceled by the flux linkages proceeding over the outer surface of magnet from the north to south poles. Thus the mercury sliding contact takes place in a region of zero flux. The presence of strong magnetic flux around the rotor, and its considerable weight, 800 lbs., make it a very difficult piece to handle mechanically. In movement around a machine shop for the various operations, every motion must be thought out carefully. After the work is finished all the tools have to be demagnetized, including large lathes and milling machines. These difficulties have to be counterbalanced by the easy accessibility of the liquid metal sliding contacts and the higher voltages obtainable from the large radius magnet stacks. Since voltage increases as the square of the machine radius, the loss in flux from non-closure of the flux path is more than compensated by the increased voltage output. i.e., if a 6 inch diameter central axle in a closed path machine were operated at say 2 x 6750 gauss or 13.5 KG then the voltage obtained would be only 1/2 of what would be gotten with half the flux (6750 gauss) at twice the radius (12 inches). The other overriding consideration is that no closed flux path is possible in a machine operating with super-conducting magnets since the attainable magnetic strength, 90 KG, will saturate known magnetic conductors. Figure (3) shows the partially assembled machine, figure (4) shows the completed N-1 machine under test. A loadbank capable of absorbing 100 KW @12 v.d.c. is in the background. Tests are preliminary for two reasons. Firstly we are operating at only a small fraction of power output for which the machine is capable, and second it is only possible to estimate the electro-mechanical efficiency of the drive motor. A second more definitive round of testing will take place when we have installed an in-line direct torque sensor between the drive motor and the N-1 generator. The exact comparisons can be made between direct horsepower mechanical input and the electrical output. Electrical testing of motors and generators is a carefully specified procedure and has been followed in accord with well established engineering practice. The results will be presented here. Reference to the testing of d.c. machines: "Principles of Direct-Current Machines", Alexander S. Langsdorf, M.M.E., 5th ed., McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., 1940. The drive motor used for our experiments is a d.c. machine originally used to supply a constant 30 v.d.c. at up to 500 amperes in aircraft service during W.W. II. Operating speed was 4000-8000 r.p.m. and output voltage was regulated by control of the field excitation, nominally 24 v.d.c. @ 12 amps. The machine has six poles and six interpoles excited by a combination of armature and field currents. The voltage picked off the commutator by six sets of brushes passes through the interpole winding which adds 1/2 v.d.c. drop for each 100 amperes of armature current. The interpoles are used to prevent commutation losses in electrical machines operated at high speed. The presence of the interpoles reduces the size of main poles by about 30% with a consequent loss in efficiency. The complete subject is dealt with in a Langsdorf's book. In addition to the IR drop in the interpole winding there is a one volt drop assigned to each carbon brush in accord with AIEE procedures. Electromechanical efficiency of d.c. machines studied hits a maximum of about 85% in the center of the operating range. Efficiency falls rapidly at low speeds and decreases much less rapidly at speeds above the maximum efficiency point. (See Langsdorf p. 525) The average of five runs on January 5, 1988 are presented. Three of the runs were at no load condition and two were under load. Operating speed for all tests was exactly 2600 rpm. Measurements were very consistent differing 1-2% from run to run. machine speed : 2600 r.p.m. internal resistance @ 800 amps : 75 micro-ohms load resistance : .003875 ohms volts/1000 r.p.m.: 1.216 Derived calculations, two loaded runs, three unloaded runs. motor power input loaded: 5030 watts unloaded : 2383 N-1 electrical output : 2480 (1) straight electrical efficiency (no corrections) = 93.8% (2) electrical efficiency corr. for brush and interpole winding drop = 108.5% (3) electrical eff. corrected assuming motor electromagnetic efficiency .8 = 136% (4) efficiency assuming motor eff. of .4 = 271% [note: What is being measured is electrical efficiency. Examination of the figures shows loaded input is supplying electrical output and no-load mechanical losses (expressed electrically). On this basis a corrected loaded input (case 2) of 4440 watts expresses a no-load mechanical loss of 2155 watts and an electrical output of 2480 watts (simultaneously). This gives an overall energy balance of 4440 watts input giving rise to 4635 watts total output (sum of elec. and mech.). This expresses an overall efficiency for the N-1 unit of 104.5%. Without corrections for motor efficiency 195 extra watts have been extracted from space.] Set of assumptions (4) seems most likely since this figure falls into line with the average of power ratios reported for N machines by Trombly (4.92), Tewari (1.75 - 2.50), DePalma (original Sunburst machine 2.5 - 3), Kincheloe (improved Sunburst 4.9). For the calculations made on the DePalma Energy N-1 unit for the five runs averaged the loaded drive motor current ranged from 194 to 197 amps. Drive motor voltage ranged from 25.5 to 26 volts respectively. Unloaded drive motor current ranged from 89.5 to 96 amps voltage from 25.4 to 25.8 volts. Loaded current output was 800 amps. @ 3.1 v.d.c. Unloaded d.c. output voltage ranged from 3.1 to 3.22, avg. 3.16. All readings taken at constant speed of 2600 r.p.m. Change in loading on the drive motor only changes armature current, armature voltage remains essentially constant. The next phase of measurements will refine the efficiency determination by a direct measurement of generator driving torque x r.p.m. from an in-line torque sensor. This installation will take some time however it was felt useful to put out an initial report since the reported results are consistent with the findings of other investigators. Many workers are attempting to construct a self-running motor generator combination operating on the principle of direct extraction of electrical energy from space. The presently used combination uses a Faraday disc motor excited from an N machine mounted on a common shaft. Even if the electro-mechanical efficiency of the Faraday disc is state of the art 96% the losses in the system may make it difficult to get the loop gain over 100%. N machine output increases as the square of the voltage or speed but mechanical losses consist of constant factors which are speed invariant and mechanical N machine output must be high enough to overshadow all the constant and speed variable losses. Examination and digestion of the parameters and figures shows it may be necessary to have electrical output of the N machine in the 30 - 40 kilowatt range before a Faraday disc N machine combination could self-sustain. A d.c. machine such as we are using for a drive motor has too many losses to be considered for a self-running combination. The self-running combination will probably require a drive motor with reduced back e.m.f. compared to the Faraday disc with the same mechanical output. For some years I have been advocating the use of a motor with such characteristics. This is covered in reference (2). A permanent magnet version of this machine has been built which operates and shows interesting characteristics. Back e.m.f. is generated in the Boning motor from the N effect voltage generated in the central axle which is both magnetized and rotating. This voltage subtracts from the applied voltage which is causing the motor to rotate. As can be appreciated from the geometry of the situation this back e.m.f. can be made 25% of that which would exist if a Faraday disc were used to the same diameter as the Boning spiral in an inside out Faraday disc motor. It is clear that if a principle of energy extraction is operative as an electrical generator, that same principle could be applied in the form of an electrical motor with reduced back e.m.f. The object to develop an N machine electrical generator of high power capability and useful voltage output has been realized with the N-1 unit. Further measurements will refine the understanding of this. Exact torque measurement will remove uncertainties from the exact power gain of this unit. Future work on the rotor will attempt to achieve high dynamic balance so the unit can be run at a designed speed without excessive vibration. Research on the self-running machine will continue with the study and further construction of the Boning motor. As work continues additional reports will be issued. The N-1 rotor unit is a manufactured item and is available from the DePalma Energy Corporation. Bruce E. DePalma, 6 January 1988, Santa Barbara, California (1) Nikola Tesla; The Electrical Engineer, N.Y., Sept 2, 1891. Published by Nikola Tesla Museum, Beograd, Yugoslavia, 1956. (2) Wireless Engineer, November 1952, Vol. 29, No. 350. (3) by Paramahamsa Tewari, Dept. of Atomic Energy, Nuclear Power Board, Bombay, India. A high quality videotape documenting the experiments described in the paper will be available from DePalma Energy Corporation. Format NTSC or PAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------