(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2) Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501 Sponsored by Vangard Sciences PO BOX 1031 Mesquite, TX 75150 January 31, 1991 SPON1.ASC -------------------------------------------------------------------- This is from FATE magazine - August 1959 - page 120 -------------------------------------------------------------------- In the regular column, Report from the Readers, the following letter was found. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Tons of Goldfish I read the letter from Helen L. McGill with a great deal of interest. It was the first I had learned of farmer's ponds seeding themselves with fish. True, I had heard of individual cases here and there, but I did not know that it was general. Her explanation of the phenomenon is novel, to say the least. I am curious as to how birds carry spawn on bits of water plant or moss or on their feet. A bit of water plant conceivably might adhere to a bird's foot for a while, but in sustained flight I fear it would dry and get blown off. Fish eggs out of water do not last long. If birds are doing this seeding it would seem that game commission men would be aware of it. Orogrande, New Mexico, in 1941 or 1942, was the scene of a fish- seeding incident. A real heller of a rain filled up a low place in the desert, forming a large lake. Within a short time, too short for natural development, goldfish, some eight inches in length were found in the water. Not juse a few; tons of them. Goldfish-fry parties were commonl until the lake dried up. As the water lowered, farmers came with tanks and barrels, hauling the fish to their own tanks. Tons of dead fish still remained when the lake finally dried up. Nevertheless, I was please to see Helen's letter. If enough interest is generated, we might learn something yet. I am not quite ready to accept the theory that where conditions are favorable life will occur spontaneously. Waite's Lake some 50 miles north of Spokane, Washington, has a bit of a mystery. The lake has no outlet, was never planted - but is populated with salmon. Jim Fortner, Long Beach, California -------------------------------------------------------------------- Vangard note.... Spontaneous Generation is supposed to have been disproved under laboratory conditions. In a natural environment, there are many factors which could produce such rapid growth. There are still some interesting arguments for and against the Page 1 case of spontaneous generation. One is that of Antoine Bechamp, a contemporary of Pasteur and the discoverer of MICROZYMAS. As a matter of fact, Pasteur was a proponent of the theory of spontaneous generation. Bechamp's work is much too extensive to cover in this paper so a simple description will be included. He discovered so many things and carried out such original research that a full paper would serve our readers well. The term Microbes is the modern equivalent of the original MicroZymas. These were found to be present in abundant quantities in the air as well as in water and earth. Microzymas are physiologically imperishable. They are not germs of the air nor are the pre-existent in the air, they are the LIVING REMAINS of organisms which have disappeared and been destroyed. After all natural organic matters, their tissues and cellules are reduced to their mineral form, there still remain only the Microzymas. They are the agents of the changes which take place in living tissues through pleomorphic reorganizations. In other words, they can "project" themselves into higher orders of being from the initial seed patterns inherent in the Microzyma. Bechamp goes on to find that these Microzymas can become corrupted to the point of inflicting disease in the host body to the point of death. The point is that Microzymas of all dead beings are omnipresent in nature. We are continually exposed to them and susceptible the their influence once they are given the proper conditions to awaken and exert their influence. To that extent, the appearance of the fish in the newly formed lakes in a very low area of land might be because at one point, that area was a lake or part of a larger body of water. If so, then the concentration of Microzymas in the area would necessarily be extremely high, accounting for the abundance of the fish and the speed of their appearance. -------------------------------------------------------------------- If you have comments or other information relating to such topics as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page. Thank you for your consideration, interest and support. Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet -------------------------------------------------------------------- If we can be of service, you may contact Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2 Page 3